How We Turned War from an Uncontrollable Crisis into a Strategic Advantage
“You cannot control every event. But you can decide which problems deserve your attention, which ones you can influence, and which ones you can turn into opportunities.”
One of the most important lessons I have learned as a transformation consultant is that organizations rarely fail because of the problems they face. They fail because they classify those problems incorrectly. When an external crisis appears, management often treats every consequence as equally urgent. Teams become overwhelmed, priorities disappear, and decision-making becomes reactive.
The best leaders do something different. They first redefine the problem. This became one of the most remarkable transformation experiences of my career.
The Transformation We Never Expected
I had been leading a management transformation program for a technology company operating in the energy sector. Our objective was ambitious but well structured.
We were designing an end-to-end Integrated Business Planning (IBP) system that connected:
- Strategy
- Strategic Objectives
- Strategic Initiatives
- Budgeting
- Demand Planning
- Portfolio Management
- Project Management
- Value Management
An entire transformation calendar had already been prepared.
- Workshops.
- Executive mentoring.
- Department sessions.
- Planning meetings.
- Implementation milestones.
The organization had committed significant resources to the program.
Then, Russia invaded Ukraine. Everything changed overnight.
The First Question Was Not “What Should We Do?”
It was:
“What problem are we actually trying to solve?”
One of the methodologies I frequently use in transformation programs is a structured problem-classification matrix.
Before searching for solutions, every issue is positioned according to two dimensions
- Is it a cause, a symptom, or an effect?
- Is it controllable, influenceable, or completely outside our control?
This sounds deceptively simple. In reality, it completely changes executive decision-making.
War itself was obviously uncontrollable. Trying to solve the war would have been absurd. But many of its consequences could be influenced. And some could even become opportunities.
We Stopped the Original Transformation
Many organizations would have continued the existing transformation while trying to “monitor the situation.” We did the opposite. During the very first week of the war, I recommended pausing the original transformation program.Instead, together with the management team, we launched a completely new transformation initiative. Everything was reorganized around three strategic workstreams.
Stream One — Help the People Who Needed It Most
This was not only a humanitarian decision, but was also a leadership decision.
The company immediately decided to donate heating and lighting equipment for refugee camps that were being established near the Romanian border. Thousands of displaced people received essential infrastructure. The company demonstrated genuine values through action rather than communication. An unexpected consequence followed.
The initiative significantly increased visibility and strengthened brand reputation across the market. Doing the right thing also became good business.
Stream Two — Reduce Risk and Exposure
The second workstream focused on protecting the business. One particularly difficult discussion involved customers with Russian ownership operating inside Romania. The easiest decision would have been to stop supplying them. Instead, management looked beyond the headlines. Those companies employed Romanian people. They were part of the local economy.
Rather than abandoning the relationships, we redesigned the commercial risk and the company introduced:
- revised payment schedules,
- tighter credit conditions,
- improved contractual protections,
- closer financial monitoring.
The business reduced its financial exposure while maintaining valuable customer relationships.
Months later, when many Russian-owned assets changed ownership, those customer relationships remained intact. The company continued serving them without interruption. Risk had been reduced without destroying future business.
Stream Three — Transform Crisis into Opportunity
This workstream produced some of the most innovative decisions.
Finding Talent Where Nobody Else Was Looking
Many Ukrainian companies operating with the same industrial brands had effectively stopped functioning. Their engineers suddenly had no projects. Borders were still open.
Together with management, we identified qualified engineers working for distributors of the same equipment brands used by our client. The company offered sanctuary, employment, and relocation support for the engineers and their families in Romania.
The outcome was extraordinary. The company acquired highly qualified specialists who were already trained on the same technologies. Recruitment in this sector normally takes months. Instead, the organization simultaneously solved a talent shortage while helping families escape a war zone.
Everyone benefited.
Building Inventory Before Everyone Else
The war immediately disrupted global supply chains and all manufacturers extended delivery times. Many European distributors hesitated, but the management of the client company decided to purchase available inventory from European dealers before shortages became widespread.
It required courage. It also required trust in structured decision-making rather than fear.
This inventory would soon become one of the company’s greatest competitive advantages.
Turning Empathy into Action
During the first weeks of the war, governments across Europe wanted to support Ukraine. Many had funding amd goodwill, but very few knew exactly what equipment was required or how to organize procurement quickly.
Working closely with management, we designed complete multi-million-euro equipment packages for critical energy infrastructure. The company approached embassies and government representatives with ready-made solutions. Because inventory had already been secured, deliveries could begin immediately while competitors were still waiting for manufacturers.
The result was significant additional revenue. More importantly, the equipment helped restore critical infrastructure where it was desperately needed. Business success and humanitarian impact became aligned rather than contradictory.
None of These Decisions Were Accidents
People often ask how organizations can make good decisions under extreme uncertainty. The answer is rarely intuition. It is structured thinking. As a consultant, my role was not to predict the future. It was to help management distinguish between:
- causes,
- symptoms,
- effects,
- controllable issues,
- influenceable issues,
- and events that simply had to be accepted.
Once problems were correctly classified, prioritization became dramatically easier. Only then did we apply structured solution-design methodologies to generate options, evaluate trade-offs, and organize execution through disciplined project management. Without that structure, the organization would almost certainly have reacted emotionally instead of strategically.
The Results
The original transformation paused. The organization itself transformed. Instead of becoming a victim of the crisis, the company:
- strengthened its reputation through meaningful humanitarian action,
- attracted exceptional engineering talent,
- secured strategic inventory before competitors,
- generated substantial additional sales,
- protected key customer relationships,
- reduced commercial risk,
- and created long-term competitive advantages while helping people in extraordinary circumstances.
The transformation eventually resumed. But the organization that returned to it was stronger than the one that had paused it.
Lessons Learned
External events are not problems. They are environments. The real problems are the decisions organizations make—or fail to make—within those environments. One of the most valuable capabilities leaders can develop is learning to separate what they cannot control from what they can influence.
When teams stop fighting reality and start influencing outcomes, remarkable things become possible.
Final Thoughts
Every crisis arrives with two stories. One is the story everyone sees. The other is the story leaders create through their decisions.
As consultants, our responsibility is not simply to solve today’s problems.
It is to help organizations classify them correctly, identify where influence still exists, and build structured responses that create value for customers, employees, shareholders, and society.
Because while no company can stop a war, every company can choose how it responds to one.
And sometimes, the greatest competitive advantage begins with asking a better question.
Leave a comment